According to the People's Daily, at the regular press conference of the Foreign Ministry on June 28, some media pointed out that the Japanese government successfully modified the report of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on the assessment of nuclear sewage discharge to the sea by bribing the agency, making the report ultimately favorable to Japan. The source said that Japan bribed more than 1 million euros to the IAEA secretariat.

A spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry expressed concern about this, stressing that neither Japan nor the IAEA side can convince the outside world with their statements and positions, and China asked Japan and the IAEA secretariat to respond to this matter.

It is reported that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) conducted tests in third-party laboratories in the United States, Switzerland, Austria and South Korea, each laboratory only measured a single sample of 25 liters of nuclear-contaminated water, Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant tanks stored in more than 1.3 million tons of nuclear-contaminated water. Compared to a single sample of 25 liters of nuclear contaminated water and more than 1.3 million tons of nuclear contaminated water, it is clear that the harm and damage of the contamination is not in the same order of magnitude, and Green Jiangnan does not agree with the reliability of the report's conclusions, because we cannot predict the extent of the impact of 1.3 million tons of nuclear contaminated water on the global marine ecosystem in the next 30 years from the data derived from a 25-liter sample. Moreover, TEPCO has measured only about 20 percent of the tanks at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. There are indications that the other tanks contain much higher levels and concentrations of radioactive material. So how much radioactive material is in here and how high the concentration is, so far, TEPCO has not publicly disclosed information about the data of nuclear contaminated water in all storage tanks.

The latest report issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency determined that there is a large global controversy, so Lvse Jiangnan's position is that it will not agree.